A Review Of trade secret case law
A Review Of trade secret case law
Blog Article
The brand new Jersey Supreme Court consists of 7 justices. Although it had been at first founded in 1776 during the American Revolution, it didn't just take a transparent form until finally the New Jersey Constitution of 1844. In contrast to many other state supreme courts, it does not hold first jurisdiction over any legal matters. The Court may review an appeal from a decreased court in the case involving the death penalty, a constitutional question, redistricting, or perhaps a dissent by an appellate justice.
Official database for searching and viewing federal court dockets and case documents. Smaller fees utilize.
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this is actually a free and democratic nation, and once a person becomes a major they can marry whosoever he/she likes; if the parents of the boy or Lady don't approve of such inter-caste or interreligious marriage the utmost they could do if they could Slice off social relations with the son or the daughter, However they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes these types of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or girl who's major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or gentleman who's a major, the pair is neither harassed by any person nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anybody who provides this kind of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence either himself or at his instigation, is taken to undertaking by instituting criminal proceedings with the police against these kinds of persons and further stern action is taken against these person(s) as provided by law.
Sign up for E-mail Notification of latest opinions The cases listed down below have had opinions filed for them within the last 14 days. The following information is obtainable for Each and every case: Information Sheet - Click a case number to view case details, which include signing JusticesJudges and participating attorneys.
Therefore, this petition is found to generally be not maintainable and is dismissed along with the pending application(s), and also the petitioners might look for remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more
In order to preserve a uniform enforcement in the laws, the legal system adheres to your doctrine of stare decisis
27 . Const. P. 4002/2011 (D.B.) Ibrahim Noor V/S Pakistan International Airways Corporation & Ors. Sindh High Court, Karachi Even, if a petitioner was acquitted in the criminal case following a conviction, in NAB Reference No. 20/2011, this does not automatically bring on exoneration from departmental charges based on the same factual grounds. While a writ under Article 199 is on the market in specific limited situations, it is generally not the appropriate remedy to contest a dismissal from service based on these charges, particularly when the employee was afforded a full possibility to cross-take a look at witnesses and present his/her defense but did not persuade the department of his/her innocence.
We have been an independent branch of government constitutionally entrusted with the fair and just resolution of disputes in order to preserve the rule of law also to protect the rights and liberties guaranteed from the Constitution and laws from the United States and this State.
The DCFS social worker in charge with the boy’s case had the boy made a ward of DCFS, As well as in her six-month report to your court, the worker elaborated about the boy’s sexual abuse history, and stated that she planned to maneuver him from a facility into a “more homelike setting.” The court approved her plan.
The regulation of necessity identified and upheld by Pakistan's highest judicial body has proved an honorable protection for military adventure in civil government.it was the illegal action called regulation of necessity..
In other circumstances as discussed supra pensionary benefits cannot be stopped on account of criminal charges after the retirement of two years; and, is violative from the legislation laid down with the Supreme Court in the case of Haji Muhammad Ismail Memon, PLD 2007 SC 35. Therefore, the competent authority in the parent department from the petitioner along with the Chief Secretary, Sindh, are liable to release the pensionary amount of your petitioner and pay the pension amount and other ancillary benefits towards the petitioner to which he is entitled under the legislation within two months from the date of receipt of this order. The competent authority on the respondent is likewise directed to recalculate the pensionary benefits of the petitioner and increases accrued thereon the withheld pensionary benefits with effect from stopping to date. Read more
These lists are sorted chronologically by Chief Justice and incorporate all notable cases decided by the court. Articles exist for almost all cases.
We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy on the information contained on this site, or maybe the information linked to to the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can deliver inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim click here Memon(Writer) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming into the main case, It is usually a nicely-proven proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence while in the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty on the charge, however, that is matter into the procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, for the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-value the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings within the evidence.